Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12 vs Samsung Standard 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL17
Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12
1×4 GB · DDR4 · 2400 MHz · CL12Samsung Standard 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL17
1×8 GB · DDR4 · 2400 MHz · CL17Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12 and Samsung Standard 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 48 and 47.
- Total capacity: Samsung Standard 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 leads (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- CAS latency: Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12 leads (CL12 vs CL17).
- Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12 has lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 14.2 ns; speed and CL combined).
Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12
If you care most about cAS latency, true latency.
Samsung Standard 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL17
If you care most about total capacity.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12 | Samsung Standard 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 | |
|---|---|---|
| 48 | Gear score | 47 |
| DDR4 | Type | DDR4 |
| 4 GB | Total capacity | 8 GB |
| 1×4 GB | Kit | 1×8 GB |
| 2,400 MHz | Speed | 2,400 MHz |
| CL12 | CAS latency | CL17 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12 or Samsung Standard 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 better?
Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12 and Samsung Standard 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 48 and 47. Total capacity: Samsung Standard 8GB (1x8GB) DDR4 2400 CL17 leads (8 GB vs 4 GB). CAS latency: Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12 leads (CL12 vs CL17). Kingston Savage 4GB (1x4GB) DDR4 2400 CL12 has lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 14.2 ns; speed and CL combined).