TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17 vs TeamGroup T-Force Zeus 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL16
TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17
2×8 GB · DDR4 · 3333 MHz · CL17TeamGroup T-Force Zeus 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL16
2×8 GB · DDR4 · 3200 MHz · CL16TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17 and TeamGroup T-Force Zeus 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 69.
- Speed: TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17 leads (3,333 MHz vs 3,200 MHz).
- CAS latency: TeamGroup T-Force Zeus 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 leads (CL16 vs CL17).
TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17
If you care most about speed.
TeamGroup T-Force Zeus 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL16
If you care most about cAS latency.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17 | TeamGroup T-Force Zeus 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 69 |
| DDR4 | Type | DDR4 |
| 16 GB | Total capacity | 16 GB |
| 2×8 GB | Kit | 2×8 GB |
| 3,333 MHz | Speed | 3,200 MHz |
| CL17 | CAS latency | CL16 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17 or TeamGroup T-Force Zeus 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 better?
TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17 and TeamGroup T-Force Zeus 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 69. Speed: TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17 leads (3,333 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). CAS latency: TeamGroup T-Force Zeus 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 CL16 leads (CL16 vs CL17).
Which one is faster?
Speed: TeamGroup Dark Pro 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3333 CL17 leads (3,333 MHz vs 3,200 MHz).