Compare / Intel Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650
Arc A380 vs GTX 1650: which is better?
Intel Arc A380 is about 9% faster than GeForce GTX 1650 in games (1080p · high settings · Ryzen 7 9800X3D). Intel Arc A380 offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: Intel Arc A380Value: Intel Arc A380
Head to head
6%
Gaming performance
6%
28/100
Part score
27/100
95 FPS
Average FPS
87 FPS
≈ $176 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $176 (used)
100/100
Value for money
92/100
Specifications
| Intel Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Board power | 75 W | 75 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 450 W | ≥ 450 W |
| AI upscaling | XeSS | FSR |
| Ray tracing | Yes | No |
| Release year | 2022 | 2019 |
Intel Arc A380: 6 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
GeForce GTX 1650: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Intel Arc A380GeForce GTX 1650
95average FPS
87average FPS