Compare / Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen 3 1200 (14nm)
Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen 3 1200 (14nm): which is better?
Core i3-4160 is about 4% faster than Ryzen 3 1200 (14nm) in games (1080p · high settings · RTX 5090). Core i3-4160 offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: Core i3-4160Cheaper: Core i3-4160Value: Core i3-4160
Head to head
16%
Gaming performance
15%
27/100
Part score
27/100
71 FPS
Average FPS
68 FPS
≈ $13 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $21 (used)
100/100
Value for money
59/100
Specifications
| Core i3-4160 | Ryzen 3 1200 (14nm) | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Max boost | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 54 W | 65 W |
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM4 |
| Memory | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Integrated graphics | Yes | No |
| Release year | 2014 | 2017 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i3-4160Ryzen 3 1200 (14nm)
71average FPS
68average FPS