Compare / Core Ultra 9 285 vs Core i7-14700F
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Core i7-14700F: which is better?
Core Ultra 9 285 and Core i7-14700F perform almost the same in games (1080p · high settings · RTX 5090). Core i7-14700F offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core i7-14700FValue: Core i7-14700F
Head to head
81%
Gaming performance
79%
86/100
Part score
85/100
313 FPS
Average FPS
309 FPS
≈ $560
Approx. price
≈ $330
60/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Core Ultra 9 285 | Core i7-14700F | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 20 |
| Max boost | 5.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| Memory | DDR5 | DDR4 / DDR5 |
| Integrated graphics | Yes | No |
| Release year | 2024 | 2024 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core Ultra 9 285Core i7-14700F
313average FPS
309average FPS