Compare / GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 Nano
GTX 1650 SUPER vs R9 Nano: which is better?
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano perform almost the same in games (1080p · high settings · Ryzen 7 9800X3D). Radeon R9 Nano offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Radeon R9 NanoValue: Radeon R9 Nano
Head to head
7%
Gaming performance
7%
30/100
Part score
30/100
103 FPS
Average FPS
102 FPS
≈ $192 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $112 (used)
60/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Board power | 100 W | 175 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 450 W | ≥ 550 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | FSR |
| Ray tracing | No | No |
| Release year | 2019 | 2015 |
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Radeon R9 Nano: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERRadeon R9 Nano
103average FPS
102average FPS