Compare / GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon R9 Nano

GTX 1660 vs R9 Nano: which is better?

GeForce GTX 1660 is about 20% faster than Radeon R9 Nano in games (1080p · high settings · Ryzen 7 9800X3D). Radeon R9 Nano offers better value for money.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

9%of the fastest card (RTX 5090)

≈ $176 (used)Part score 34/100

Change this side →

AMD

Radeon R9 Nano

7%of the fastest card (RTX 5090)

≈ $112 (used)Part score 30/100

Change this side →

Faster: GeForce GTX 1660Cheaper: Radeon R9 NanoValue: Radeon R9 Nano

Head to head

Gaming performance

34/100

Part score

30/100

122 FPS

Average FPS

102 FPS

≈ $176 (used)

Approx. price

≈ $112 (used)

84/100

Value for money

100/100

Specifications

	GeForce GTX 1660	Radeon R9 Nano
Video memory (VRAM)	6 GB	4 GB
Board power	120 W	175 W
Recommended PSU	≥ 450 W	≥ 550 W
AI upscaling	FSR	FSR
Ray tracing	No	No
Release year	2019	2015

GeForce GTX 1660: 6 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.

Radeon R9 Nano: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.

Free · no install

How many FPS does your graphics card get?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PC See the leaderboard →