Compare / Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i3-7300
Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i3-7300: which is better?
Ryzen 5 1600X is about 5% faster than Core i3-7300 in games (1080p · high settings · RTX 5090). Core i3-7300 offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: Ryzen 5 1600XCheaper: Core i3-7300Value: Core i3-7300
Head to head
22%
Gaming performance
21%
34/100
Part score
33/100
97 FPS
Average FPS
92 FPS
≈ $39 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $23 (used)
62/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Ryzen 5 1600X | Core i3-7300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 2 |
| Max boost | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 95 W | 51 W |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| Memory | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2017 | 2017 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Ryzen 5 1600XCore i3-7300
97average FPS
92average FPS