Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ
Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · VAASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSAcer ED320Q Xbmiipx and ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx | ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $235 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx or ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ better?
Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx and ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer ED320Q Xbmiipx leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).