ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32UHD144
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (4 ms vs 12 ms).
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32UHD144
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ | Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 12 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ or Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 better?
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (4 ms vs 12 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZ leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).