Acer Nitro VG272U V vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
Acer Nitro VG272U V
27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSAcer Nitro VG272U V and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Refresh rate: Acer Nitro VG272U V leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Acer Nitro VG272U V
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Nitro VG272U V | Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Nitro VG272U V or Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 better?
Acer Nitro VG272U V and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Refresh rate: Acer Nitro VG272U V leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer Nitro VG272U V leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).