Acer PREDATOR X32 FP vs ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN
Acer PREDATOR X32 FP
32″ · 3840×2160 · 165 Hz · Mini LED IPSASUS ROG Strix XG259QN
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 380 Hz · IPSAcer PREDATOR X32 FP and ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82.
- Resolution: Acer PREDATOR X32 FP leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN leads (380 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
Acer PREDATOR X32 FP
If you care most about resolution.
ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer PREDATOR X32 FP | ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Gear score | 82 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 380 Hz |
| Mini LED IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer PREDATOR X32 FP or ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN better?
Acer PREDATOR X32 FP and ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82. Resolution: Acer PREDATOR X32 FP leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN leads (380 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG259QN leads (380 Hz vs 165 Hz).