Acer PREDATOR X32 FP vs MSI MAG 274UPF E2
Acer PREDATOR X32 FP
32″ · 3840×2160 · 165 Hz · Mini LED IPSMSI MAG 274UPF E2
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSAcer PREDATOR X32 FP and MSI MAG 274UPF E2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82.
- Refresh rate: Acer PREDATOR X32 FP leads (165 Hz vs 160 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 274UPF E2 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Acer PREDATOR X32 FP
If you care most about refresh rate.
MSI MAG 274UPF E2
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer PREDATOR X32 FP | MSI MAG 274UPF E2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Gear score | 82 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| Mini LED IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $350 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer PREDATOR X32 FP or MSI MAG 274UPF E2 better?
Acer PREDATOR X32 FP and MSI MAG 274UPF E2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82. Refresh rate: Acer PREDATOR X32 FP leads (165 Hz vs 160 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 274UPF E2 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer PREDATOR X32 FP leads (165 Hz vs 160 Hz).