Acer UM.CC0AA.001 vs ASUS MG24UQ
Acer UM.CC0AA.001
34″ · 3440×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSASUS MG24UQ
23.6″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSAcer UM.CC0AA.001 and ASUS MG24UQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
- Resolution: ASUS MG24UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Acer UM.CC0AA.001 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS MG24UQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Acer UM.CC0AA.001
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS MG24UQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer UM.CC0AA.001 | ASUS MG24UQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 23.6″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer UM.CC0AA.001 or ASUS MG24UQ better?
Acer UM.CC0AA.001 and ASUS MG24UQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58. Resolution: ASUS MG24UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Acer UM.CC0AA.001 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS MG24UQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer UM.CC0AA.001 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).