Acer UM.CC0AA.001 vs BenQ BL3201PH
Acer UM.CC0AA.001
34″ · 3440×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ BL3201PH
32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSAcer UM.CC0AA.001 and BenQ BL3201PH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
- Resolution: BenQ BL3201PH leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Acer UM.CC0AA.001 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ BL3201PH leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Acer UM.CC0AA.001
If you care most about refresh rate.
BenQ BL3201PH
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer UM.CC0AA.001 | BenQ BL3201PH | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer UM.CC0AA.001 or BenQ BL3201PH better?
Acer UM.CC0AA.001 and BenQ BL3201PH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58. Resolution: BenQ BL3201PH leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Acer UM.CC0AA.001 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ BL3201PH leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer UM.CC0AA.001 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).