Monitors / Comparison

Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel vs BenQ SW242Q

Monitor · Achieva

Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel

27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 52.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
VS
Monitor · BenQ

BenQ SW242Q

24.1″ · 2560×1600 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 52.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution83
Panel80
Response time50
Verdict

Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel and BenQ SW242Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.

  • Resolution: BenQ SW242Q leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440).
Pick this

BenQ SW242Q

If you care most about resolution.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect PixelBenQ SW242Q
52Gear score52
27″Screen size24.1″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1600
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
IPSPanelIPS
—Response time5 ms
—Estimated price≈ $550

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel or BenQ SW242Q better?

Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel and BenQ SW242Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: BenQ SW242Q leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440).