Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel vs MSI PRO MP225V
Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSMSI PRO MP225V
21.4″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · VAAchieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel and MSI PRO MP225V are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI PRO MP225V leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel
If you care most about resolution.
MSI PRO MP225V
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel | MSI PRO MP225V | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 21.4″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $65 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel or MSI PRO MP225V better?
Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel and MSI PRO MP225V are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI PRO MP225V leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI PRO MP225V leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).