AOC 24G4HRE vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
AOC 24G4HRE
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Fast IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSAOC 24G4HRE and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: AOC 24G4HRE leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: AOC 24G4HRE leads (0.5 ms vs 3 ms).
AOC 24G4HRE
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC 24G4HRE | Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 74 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 200 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC 24G4HRE or Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 better?
AOC 24G4HRE and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: AOC 24G4HRE leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: AOC 24G4HRE leads (0.5 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC 24G4HRE leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).