AOC 27G4X vs ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
AOC 27G4X
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSAOC 27G4X and ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: AOC 27G4X leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: AOC 27G4X leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC 27G4X
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC 27G4X | ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $2,700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC 27G4X or ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K better?
AOC 27G4X and ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: AOC 27G4X leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: AOC 27G4X leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC 27G4X leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).