AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM
34″ · 3440×1440 · 170 Hz · Mini LED IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD240
32″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSAOC AGON Pro AG344UXM and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 170 Hz).
- Response time: AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM | Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Mini LED IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM or Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 better?
AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM and Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 170 Hz). Response time: AOC AGON Pro AG344UXM leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 170 Hz).