AOC CQ32G3SE vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
AOC CQ32G3SE
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSAOC CQ32G3SE and ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC CQ32G3SE leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
AOC CQ32G3SE
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC CQ32G3SE | ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| ≈ $224 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC CQ32G3SE or ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV better?
AOC CQ32G3SE and ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC CQ32G3SE leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC CQ32G3SE leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).