ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 8 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 2 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $350 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).