AOC CU32V3 vs BenQ GW3290QT
AOC CU32V3
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VABenQ GW3290QT
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSAOC CU32V3 and BenQ GW3290QT are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Resolution: AOC CU32V3 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: BenQ GW3290QT leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: AOC CU32V3 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC CU32V3
If you care most about resolution, response time.
BenQ GW3290QT
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC CU32V3 | BenQ GW3290QT | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $360 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC CU32V3 or BenQ GW3290QT better?
AOC CU32V3 and BenQ GW3290QT are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Resolution: AOC CU32V3 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: BenQ GW3290QT leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: AOC CU32V3 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ GW3290QT leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).