ASUS PB287Q vs BenQ GW3290QT
ASUS PB287Q
28″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · TNBenQ GW3290QT
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSASUS PB287Q and BenQ GW3290QT are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Resolution: ASUS PB287Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: BenQ GW3290QT leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS PB287Q leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS PB287Q
If you care most about resolution, response time.
BenQ GW3290QT
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS PB287Q | BenQ GW3290QT | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 28″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| TN | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $360 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS PB287Q or BenQ GW3290QT better?
ASUS PB287Q and BenQ GW3290QT are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Resolution: ASUS PB287Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: BenQ GW3290QT leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS PB287Q leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ GW3290QT leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).