Monitors / Comparison
AOC i2267Fw vs LG Neo Blade III
Monitor · AOC
AOC i2267Fw
22″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · LG
LG Neo Blade III
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time50
Verdict
AOC i2267Fw and LG Neo Blade III are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 44.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC i2267Fw | LG Neo Blade III | |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | Gear score | 44 |
| 22″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $200 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC i2267Fw or LG Neo Blade III better?
AOC i2267Fw and LG Neo Blade III are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 44.