LG Neo Blade III vs Samsung S30B
LG Neo Blade III
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSSamsung S30B
32″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VALG Neo Blade III and Samsung S30B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 43.
- Refresh rate: Samsung S30B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: LG Neo Blade III leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
LG Neo Blade III
If you care most about response time.
Samsung S30B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG Neo Blade III | Samsung S30B | |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | Gear score | 43 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| ≈ $200 | Estimated price | ≈ $280 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG Neo Blade III or Samsung S30B better?
LG Neo Blade III and Samsung S30B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 43. Refresh rate: Samsung S30B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: LG Neo Blade III leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung S30B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: LG Neo Blade III ≈ $200, Samsung S30B ≈ $280. Current prices vary by store.