AOC Q3279VWF vs AOC U3277PWQU
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAAOC Q3279VWF and AOC U3277PWQU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: AOC U3277PWQU leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: AOC U3277PWQU leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate.
AOC U3277PWQU
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | AOC U3277PWQU | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or AOC U3277PWQU better?
AOC Q3279VWF and AOC U3277PWQU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: AOC U3277PWQU leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: AOC U3277PWQU leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).