AOC Q3279VWF vs BenQ SW242Q
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VABenQ SW242Q
24.1″ · 2560×1600 · 60 Hz · IPSAOC Q3279VWF and BenQ SW242Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: BenQ SW242Q leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate.
BenQ SW242Q
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | BenQ SW242Q | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24.1″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1600 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $550 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or BenQ SW242Q better?
AOC Q3279VWF and BenQ SW242Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: BenQ SW242Q leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).