AOC Q34G3 vs Philips 288P6LJEB
Philips 288P6LJEB
28″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · TNAOC Q34G3 and Philips 288P6LJEB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50.
- Resolution: Philips 288P6LJEB leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q34G3 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
AOC Q34G3
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 288P6LJEB
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q34G3 | Philips 288P6LJEB | |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | Gear score | 50 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 28″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q34G3 or Philips 288P6LJEB better?
AOC Q34G3 and Philips 288P6LJEB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50. Resolution: Philips 288P6LJEB leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: AOC Q34G3 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q34G3 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).