Monitors / Comparison

AOC U3277PWQU vs Samsung FT872

Monitor · AOC

AOC U3277PWQU

32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz
GEAR SCORE 52.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung FT872

31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 52.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel66
Response time30
Verdict

AOC U3277PWQU and Samsung FT872 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.

  • Response time: AOC U3277PWQU leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this

AOC U3277PWQU

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

AOC U3277PWQUSamsung FT872
52Gear score52
32″Screen size31.5″
3840×2160Resolution3840×2160
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
—PanelVA
4 msResponse time8 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is AOC U3277PWQU or Samsung FT872 better?

AOC U3277PWQU and Samsung FT872 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Response time: AOC U3277PWQU leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).