Monitors / Comparison
AOC U3277PWQU vs Samsung M70UA
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung M70UA
43″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel66
Response time30
Verdict
AOC U3277PWQU and Samsung M70UA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Response time: AOC U3277PWQU leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this
AOC U3277PWQU
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC U3277PWQU | Samsung M70UA | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 43″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| — | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC U3277PWQU or Samsung M70UA better?
AOC U3277PWQU and Samsung M70UA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Response time: AOC U3277PWQU leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Similar comparisons
AOC U3277PWQU vs MSI PRO MP223 E2AOC U3277PWQU vs MSI PRO MP225VAOC U3277PWQU vs MSI Pro MP2412AOC U3277PWQU vs BenQ SW242QAOC U3277PWQU vs AOC Q3279VWFSamsung M70UA vs MSI PRO MP223 E2Samsung M70UA vs MSI PRO MP225VSamsung M70UA vs MSI Pro MP2412Samsung M70UA vs BenQ SW242QSamsung M70UA vs Samsung FT872