ASRock PG27F15RS1A vs ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
ASRock PG27F15RS1A
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSASRock PG27F15RS1A and ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASRock PG27F15RS1A leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).
ASRock PG27F15RS1A
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock PG27F15RS1A | ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $2,700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock PG27F15RS1A or ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K better?
ASRock PG27F15RS1A and ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASRock PG27F15RS1A leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASRock PG27F15RS1A leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).