ASRock PG32QF2B vs MSI Optix MAG301CR3
ASRock PG32QF2B
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAMSI Optix MAG301CR3
29.5″ · 2560×1080 · 200 Hz · VAASRock PG32QF2B and MSI Optix MAG301CR3 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 70.
- Resolution: ASRock PG32QF2B leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI Optix MAG301CR3 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
ASRock PG32QF2B
If you care most about resolution.
MSI Optix MAG301CR3
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock PG32QF2B | MSI Optix MAG301CR3 | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 29.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| ≈ $204 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock PG32QF2B or MSI Optix MAG301CR3 better?
ASRock PG32QF2B and MSI Optix MAG301CR3 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 70. Resolution: ASRock PG32QF2B leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: MSI Optix MAG301CR3 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI Optix MAG301CR3 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).