ASRock PG32QF2B vs ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
ASRock PG32QF2B
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSASRock PG32QF2B and ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASRock PG32QF2B leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
ASRock PG32QF2B
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock PG32QF2B | ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $204 | Estimated price | ≈ $2,700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock PG32QF2B or ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K better?
ASRock PG32QF2B and ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASRock PG32QF2B leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASRock PG32QF2B leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASRock PG32QF2B ≈ $204, ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K ≈ $2,700. Current prices vary by store.