Monitors / Comparison

ASRock PG34WQ15R2B vs MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD

Monitor · ASRock

ASRock PG34WQ15R2B

34″ · 3440×1440 · 165 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 74.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution88
Panel66
VS
Monitor · MSI

MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD

27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 74.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate69
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
Verdict

ASRock PG34WQ15R2B and MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.

  • Resolution: ASRock PG34WQ15R2B leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
  • Refresh rate: MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Pick this

ASRock PG34WQ15R2B

If you care most about resolution.

Pick this

MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASRock PG34WQ15R2BMSI MAG 275CQRF-QD
74Gear score74
34″Screen size27″
3440×1440Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate170 Hz
VAPanelVA
—Response time1 ms
—Estimated price≈ $182

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ASRock PG34WQ15R2B or MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD better?

ASRock PG34WQ15R2B and MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Resolution: ASRock PG34WQ15R2B leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: MSI MAG 275CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).