Monitors / Comparison
ASRock PG34WQ15R2B vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
Monitor · ASRock
ASRock PG34WQ15R2B
34″ · 3440×1440 · 165 Hz · VAVery good
Refresh rate68
Resolution88
Panel66
VS
Monitor · Corsair
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSVery good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time69
Verdict
ASRock PG34WQ15R2B and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.
- Resolution: ASRock PG34WQ15R2B leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
Pick this
ASRock PG34WQ15R2B
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock PG34WQ15R2B | Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 74 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock PG34WQ15R2B or Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 better?
ASRock PG34WQ15R2B and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Resolution: ASRock PG34WQ15R2B leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
Similar comparisons
ASRock PG34WQ15R2B vs ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPASRock PG34WQ15R2B vs Razer Raptor 27ASRock PG34WQ15R2B vs MSI MAG 244FASRock PG34WQ15R2B vs MSI MAG 275CQRF-QDCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Razer Raptor 27Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 244FCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 275CQRF-QDCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD