ASUS MG278Q vs Samsung C49J890DKE
ASUS MG278Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · TNSamsung C49J890DKE
48.9″ · 3840×1080 · 144 Hz · VAASUS MG278Q and Samsung C49J890DKE are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: Samsung C49J890DKE leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: ASUS MG278Q leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS MG278Q
If you care most about response time.
Samsung C49J890DKE
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MG278Q | Samsung C49J890DKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 48.9″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $600 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MG278Q or Samsung C49J890DKE better?
ASUS MG278Q and Samsung C49J890DKE are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: Samsung C49J890DKE leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440). Response time: ASUS MG278Q leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).