BenQ XL2735 vs Samsung C49J890DKE
BenQ XL2735
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · TNSamsung C49J890DKE
48.9″ · 3840×1080 · 144 Hz · VABenQ XL2735 and Samsung C49J890DKE are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: Samsung C49J890DKE leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: BenQ XL2735 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
BenQ XL2735
If you care most about response time.
Samsung C49J890DKE
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ XL2735 | Samsung C49J890DKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 48.9″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ XL2735 or Samsung C49J890DKE better?
BenQ XL2735 and Samsung C49J890DKE are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: Samsung C49J890DKE leads (3840×1080 vs 2560×1440). Response time: BenQ XL2735 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).