ASUS MG279Q vs KTC M27T20
ASUS MG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSKTC M27T20
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · Mini LEDASUS MG279Q and KTC M27T20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Refresh rate: KTC M27T20 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: KTC M27T20 leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
KTC M27T20
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MG279Q | KTC M27T20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Mini LED |
| 4 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $340 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MG279Q or KTC M27T20 better?
ASUS MG279Q and KTC M27T20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Refresh rate: KTC M27T20 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: KTC M27T20 leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: KTC M27T20 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).