ASUS MG279Q vs Rampage Xyra XR27C240F
ASUS MG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSRampage Xyra XR27C240F
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · VAASUS MG279Q and Rampage Xyra XR27C240F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS MG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Rampage Xyra XR27C240F leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
ASUS MG279Q
If you care most about resolution.
Rampage Xyra XR27C240F
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MG279Q | Rampage Xyra XR27C240F | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MG279Q or Rampage Xyra XR27C240F better?
ASUS MG279Q and Rampage Xyra XR27C240F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS MG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Rampage Xyra XR27C240F leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Rampage Xyra XR27C240F leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).