ASUS MG279Q vs ViewSonic XG2409
ASUS MG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSViewSonic XG2409
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · IPSASUS MG279Q and ViewSonic XG2409 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS MG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2409 leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ViewSonic XG2409 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS MG279Q
If you care most about resolution.
ViewSonic XG2409
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MG279Q | ViewSonic XG2409 | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MG279Q or ViewSonic XG2409 better?
ASUS MG279Q and ViewSonic XG2409 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS MG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2409 leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ViewSonic XG2409 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2409 leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).