Monitors / Comparison
ASUS ML228H vs Samsung SF350
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS ML228H
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TN · 2010Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time78
Recency20
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung SF350
22″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time60
Verdict
ASUS ML228H and Samsung SF350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.
- Response time: ASUS ML228H leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Pick this
ASUS ML228H
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ML228H | Samsung SF350 | |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | Gear score | 39 |
| 21.5″ | Screen size | 22″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | TN |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| 2010 | Release year | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ML228H or Samsung SF350 better?
ASUS ML228H and Samsung SF350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39. Response time: ASUS ML228H leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).