Monitors / Comparison
BenQ BL2400PU vs Samsung SF350
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ BL2400PU
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung SF350
22″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time60
Verdict
BenQ BL2400PU and Samsung SF350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.
- Response time: Samsung SF350 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this
Samsung SF350
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ BL2400PU | Samsung SF350 | |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | Gear score | 39 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 22″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | TN |
| 8 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ BL2400PU or Samsung SF350 better?
BenQ BL2400PU and Samsung SF350 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39. Response time: Samsung SF350 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).