ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift vs Philips 25M2N3200W
ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSPhilips 25M2N3200W
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · VAASUS PG279Q ROG Swift and Philips 25M2N3200W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N3200W leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 25M2N3200W leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 25M2N3200W
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift | Philips 25M2N3200W | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift or Philips 25M2N3200W better?
ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift and Philips 25M2N3200W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N3200W leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Philips 25M2N3200W leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N3200W leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).