ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144
ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32UHD144
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS PG279Q ROG Swift and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift leads (4 ms vs 12 ms).
ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Corsair XENEON 32UHD144
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift | Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 12 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift or Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 better?
ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift and Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 32UHD144 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift leads (4 ms vs 12 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).