ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift vs Philips 27M2N3200A
ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M2N3200A
27″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Fast IPSASUS PG279Q ROG Swift and Philips 27M2N3200A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3200A leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 27M2N3200A leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27M2N3200A
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift | Philips 27M2N3200A | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift or Philips 27M2N3200A better?
ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift and Philips 27M2N3200A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3200A leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Philips 27M2N3200A leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3200A leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).