ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV vs Philips BDM3270QP2
ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 75 Hz · IPSPhilips BDM3270QP2
32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA248QV and Philips BDM3270QP2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.
- Resolution: Philips BDM3270QP2 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips BDM3270QP2 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips BDM3270QP2
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV | Philips BDM3270QP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | Gear score | 49 |
| 24.1″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $169 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV or Philips BDM3270QP2 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV and Philips BDM3270QP2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Resolution: Philips BDM3270QP2 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200). Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips BDM3270QP2 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA248QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).