ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift PG258Q
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
If you care most about resolution.
ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV | ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $359 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV or ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).