ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
If you care most about response time.
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV | Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| ≈ $359 | Estimated price | ≈ $350 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV or Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV ≈ $359, Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 ≈ $350. Current prices vary by store.