ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs BenQ XL2546
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSBenQ XL2546
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and BenQ XL2546 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ XL2546 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ XL2546 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
If you care most about resolution.
BenQ XL2546
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV | BenQ XL2546 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $359 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV or BenQ XL2546 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and BenQ XL2546 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ XL2546 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: BenQ XL2546 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ XL2546 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).